A certain organization trying to decide where to locate their future factory is considering three locations. They are taking into account three factors: labor costs, currency stability, and proximity to market. Using the weights for each factor listed below and the scores achieved by each of the three considered locations, determine which location should be chosen for the new facility based on the weighted factory location model. SCORES (Maximum 100)
FACTOR WEIGHT SITE A SITE B SITE C
Labor Cost 0.25 92 82 84
Currency Stability 0.35 75 85 88
Proximity to Market 0.30 80 50 60
Taxes 0.10 69 88 91

a. Site A
b. Site B
c. Site C
d. All sites are equally attractive

SITE A

Explanation:

Given :

FACTOR___ WEIGHT _SITE A_ SITE B _SITE C

Labor Cost __ 0.25 92 82 84

Curr Stability _ 0.35 75 ___ 85 88

Prox Market __ 0.30 80 50 ___ 60

Taxes 0.10 69 ___ 88 ___ 91

SITE A:

(0.25 * 92) + (0.35*75) + (0.30*80) + (0.10*69) = 80.15

SITE B :

(0.25 * 82) + (0.35*85) + (0.30*50) + (0.10*88) = 74.05

SITE C :

(0.25 * 84) + (0.35*88) + (0.30*60) + (0.10*91) = 78.90

Using the weighed factor model;

The based site for locating the facility is SITE A as it has the highest weighted value

im going to come back to you?

the correct answer is - no.

winnipeg, canada, is not further away from the equator than moscow, russia, in fact moscow is the city that is further away from the equator. moscow is on a latitude of 55.7558° north, while winnipeg is on a latitude of 49.8951° north, thus putting moscow by 5.8607° further away from the equator than winnipeg is.