Grand Teton National Park has become a popular U. S. destination for heli-skiing, with commercial helicopter operators landing to deliver and retrieve skiers and snowboarders in locations otherwise inaccessible or accessible only with great physical difficulty. Other users of the park's back country have begun to complain to the National Park Service (NPS), that the noise of the helicopters has become almost continual in some areas, where it is destroying the tranquility of the back country experience and driving the wildlife away. Analyze whether the NPS, acting on its own authority, can legally ban helicopters from landing and taking off at locations within the park? Identify the applicable governmental power and explain your legal reasoning clearly in proper legal terminology. Analyze whether the NPS, acting on its own authority, can legally ban helicopters from flying low over the park? Identify the applicable law and its source and explain your legal reasoning clearly in proper legal terminology. If you determined that the NPS could not, acting on its own authority, accomplish either of both of the foregoing, then identify the law and procedures the NPS and any other government agency involved would be required to follow in order to legally accomplish the task(s), explaining your reasoning clearly in proper legal terminology.

This problem has been solved! see the answercompute and interpret altman's z-scoresfollowing is selected financial information for ebay, for its fiscal years 2005 and 2006.(in millions, except per share data) 2006 2005current assets $ 4,970.59 $ 3,183.24current liabilities 2,518.39 1,484.93total assets 13,494.01 11,788.99total liabilities 2,589.38 1,741.00shares outstanding 1,368.51 1,404.18retained earnings 4,538.35 2,819.64stock price per share 30.07 43.22sales 5,969.74 4,552.40earnings before interest and taxes 1,439.77 1,445.18compute and interpret altman z-scores for the company for both years. (do not round until your final answer; then round your answers to two decimal places.)2006 z-score = answer2005 z-score = answerwhich of the following best describes the company's likelihood to go bankrupt given the z-score in 2006 compared to 2007.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. both z-scores are well above the score that represents a healthy company.the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly increased the risk of bankruptcy.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. the z-score has decreased sharply, which suggests the company is in financial distress.the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly lowered the risk of bankruptcy.