If government intervenes in the business sector to prevent the merger of two businesses, what is the best explanation for how this results in greater market freedom?A. Government might intervene in this way if one of the merging companies has not fulfilled its tax liability because paying taxes is necessary to a free market. B. A market in which mergers are allowed is a market in which no business can ever be free from the possibility of being taken over.
C. By preventing mergers that would lead to companies having too much power, the government protects free competition.
D. Government intervention of this sort never results in a free market and is only found in countries that do not adhere to free market principles.