subject
Business, 17.04.2021 17:10 thruhdyjgrt

Arrowhead Uranium Company was one of the original uranium mining companies in the Cameron Arizona region of Northern Arizona, operating from 1952 to the mid 1960's at several different mine sites on the Navajo Reservation. The land where the mine sites were located was owned by the United States in trust for the Navajo Nation. The Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Indian Affairs oversaw some aspects of the mining permits and leases for the Nation. Permits were approved by the director of the BIA (an employee of the United States government). All money related to the mining was paid to the United States Treasury for deposit exclusively in Navajo tribal funds. For almost three decades, the Mine Sites remained largely in the same condition as when mining ceased, with open pits and waste piles on the properties. In 1975, Arrowhead was closed and its assets were bought by Lightning Mines. In the 1980s, the Navajo Nation became concerned about possible health impacts of abandoned uranium mines on the Reservation. People were frequenting the pits for recreational purposes, and livestock was watering at the pits. The Navajo Nation leadership discussed their concerns with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As a result the EPA cleaned up the mine sites. 1. Arrowhead Uranium Company ran mines on the Navajo Reservation that extracted (uranium, natural gas, coal)
2. The land that was potentially contaminated was owned by (Arrowhead, the United States, the Navajo Nation)
3. Lightning Mines (was, was not) involved in the generation of waste.
4. The law that covers allocation of the costs of cleaning up toxic waste is (CERCLA, RCRA, Title VII) also known as the (Superfund, Cleanup Fund, Cleanup Responsibility Act)
5. Under that law, (anyone who benefitted from the activity is, several parties are) responsible for the cost of cleaning up the waste.
6. Responsibility for cleaning up a toxic waste site falls on the person who (generated, collected, eliminated) the waste, any party who (transported the waste to the site, complained about the waste), the party who (owned, cleaned) the site, the party who (operated, closed down) the site, or the (current owner, neighbor) of the site.
7. Arrowhead was the (party that generated the waste, owner of the site when the waste was generated, current owner of the site).
8. The United States was the (party that generated the waste, owner of the site when the waste was generated, current owner of the site).
9. The Navajo Nation was (owner of the site when the waste was generated, party that generated the site, not involved in generating the waste).
10. A party who is responsible for the cleanup is called a (potentially responsible party, toxic waste generator)
11. Of the parties mentioned, (the United States, Arrowhead, the Navajo Nation) is not a potentially responsible party.
12. Arrowhead (no longer exists, still runs the mines) but was bought by (Lightning Mines, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Bureau of Indian Affairs).
13. If the potentially responsible parties do not clean up a hazardous site, the (EPA, current owner, Bureau of Indian Affairs) can clean it up and recover costs from the (potentially responsible parties, Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Indian Affairs).
14. Liability for cleanup extends to a business that (buys enters in to a contract with) a potentially responsible party.
15. Any potentially responsible party is responsible for (the entire, their percentage share of the) cost of cleanup under the doctrine of
(joint and several liability, res judicata).
16. If a potentially responsible party pays for the entire cost of cleanup, that party (can, cannot) bring a contribution action for a percentage of the costs.
17. In this situation the cost of cleanup must be paid by (the United States only, the United States and the Navajo Nation, the United States and Lightning Mines, Lightning Mines only)

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 01:00
Suppose that hubert, an economist from an am talk radio program, and kate, an economist from a nonprofit organization on the west coast, are arguing over government bailouts. the following dialogue shows an excerpt from their debate: kate: to recent financial crises, the concept of bailouts is a hot topic for debate among everyone these days. hubert: indeed, it’s gotten crazy! a government bailout of severely distressed financial firms is unnecessary because free markets will properly price assets. kate: i don’t know about that. without a bailout of severely distressed financial firms, the economy will experience a deep recession. the disagreement between these economists is most likely due todifferences in scientific judgments . despite their differences, with which proposition are two economists chosen at random most likely to agree? business managers can raise profit more easily by reducing costs than by raising revenue. central banks should focus more on maintaining low unemployment than on maintaining low inflation. employers should not be restricted from outsourcing work to foreign nations
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:10
With signals from no-claim bonuses and deductibles, a. the marginal cost curve for careful drivers lies to the left of the marginal cost curve for aggressive drivers b. auto insurance companies insure more aggressive drivers than careful drivers because aggressive drivers have a greater need for the insurance c. the market for car insurance has a separating equilibrium, and the market is efficient d. most drivers pay higher premiums than if the market had no signals
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:40
Which of the following would indicate an improvement in a company's financial position, holding other things constant? a. the inventory and total assets turnover ratios both decline.b. the debt ratio increases.c. the profit margin declines.d. the times-interest-earned ratio declines.e. the current and quick ratios both increase.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:40
Inventory by three methods; cost of goods sold the units of an item available for sale during the year were as follows: jan. 1 inventory 20 units at $1,800 may 15 purchase 31 units at $1,950 aug. 7 purchase 13 units at $2,040 nov. 20 purchase 16 units at $2,100 there are 18 units of the item in the physical inventory at december 31. determine the cost of ending inventory and the cost of goods sold by three methods, presenting your answers in the following form: round your final answers to the nearest dollar. cost inventory method ending inventory cost of goods sold a. first-in, first-out method $ $ b. last-in, first-out method $ $ c. weighted average cost method $ $
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Arrowhead Uranium Company was one of the original uranium mining companies in the Cameron Arizona re...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 04.08.2019 22:00
question
Social Studies, 04.08.2019 22:00
Questions on the website: 13722361