Jamal and Keisha each earn money by washing cars and mowing lawns. Jamal can mow 4 lawns or wash 8 cars in one day. Keisha can mow 3 lawns or wash 9 cars in one day. They both charge $25 for each lawn and $15 for each car.

The chart shows their production after 3 days.

A 3-column table has 2 rows. The first column has entries Lawns, cars. The second column is labeled Jamal with entries 12, 24. The third column is labeled Keisha with entries 9, 27.

Jamal and Keisha are considering entering into an agreement to trade tasks.

How can specialization of labor benefit Jamal and Keisha? Check all that apply.

Jamal can specialize in washing cars, because he has the comparative advantage.
Keisha can specialize in washing cars, because she has the comparative advantage.
Specialization allows them to collectively mow 3 more lawns and wash 3 more cars every three days.
Specialization allows them to collectively mow 12 more lawns and wash 27 more cars every three days.
Specialization allows them to earn more money.

If delta airlines were to significantly change its fare structure and flight schedule to enhance its competitive position in response to aggressive price cutting by southwest airlines, this would be an example ofanswers: explicit collusion.tacit collusion.competitive dynamics.a harvest strategy.

Overspeculation and a decrease in consumer confidence are both leading factors of: ?

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.