subject
Business, 16.06.2021 21:00 iiMxlissaii

Suppose that Musashi, an economist from an AM talk radio program, and Rina, an economist from a university in Massachusetts, are arguing over health insurance. The following dialogue shows an excerpt from their debate: Rina: A popular topic for debate among politicians as well as economists is the idea of providing government assistance for health benefits.
Musashi: I think it is oppressive for the government to tax people who take care of themselves in order to pay for health insurance for those who are obese.
Rina: I disagree. I think government funding of health insurance is useful to ensure basic fairness.

The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to:

a. Differences in scientific judgments
b. Differences in Values
c. Differences between perception VS. reality

Despite their differences, with which proposition are two economists chosen at random most likely to agree?

a. Lawyers make up an excessive percentage of elected officials.
b. Minimum wage laws do more to harm low-skilled workers than help them.
c. Tariffs and import quotas generally reduce economic welfare.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 14:00
Identifying type and normal balances of accounts lo c4 for each of the following (1) identify the type of account as an asset, liability, equity, revenue, or expense, (2) identify the normal balance of the account, and (3) select debit (dr.) or credit (cr.) to identify the kind of entry that would increase the account balance.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:20
Richardson hired j.c. flood company, a plumbing contractor, to correct a stoppage in the sewer line of her house. the plumbing company's 'snake' device, used to clear the line leading to the main sewer, became caught in the underground line. to release it, the company excavated a portion of the sewer line in richardson's backyard. in the process, the company discovered numerous leaks in a rusty, defective water pipe that ran parallel with the sewer line. to meet public regulations, the water pipe, of a type no longer approved for such service, had to be replaced either then or later, when the yard would have to be excavated again. the plumbing company proceeded to repair the water pipe. though richardson inspected the company's work daily and did not express any objection to the extra work involved in replacing the water pipe, she refused to pay any part of the total bill after the company completed the entire operation. j.c. flood company then sued richardson for the costs of labor and material it had furnished. (c) for what, if anything, should richardson be liable? explain."
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 09:50
Why should managers invest any excess cash
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 10:00
The solution set for -18 < 5x-3 iso-3х3< xо-3хo3 > x
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Suppose that Musashi, an economist from an AM talk radio program, and Rina, an economist from a univ...
Questions
question
English, 11.02.2021 18:00
question
Mathematics, 11.02.2021 18:00
question
Mathematics, 11.02.2021 18:00
Questions on the website: 13722363