Financial statements are inexorably moving to a model where all assets and liabilities will be measured on the basis of fair value rather than historical cost. Required:
a. Discuss the conceptual differences between historical cost and fair value.
b. Discuss the merits and demerits of the two alternative measurement models.
c. What types of assets (or liabilities) more readily lend themselves to fair value measurements? Can we visualize a scenario where all assets are measured using fair value?
d. What are the likely effects of adopting the fair value model on reported income?

Part a

historical cost = this is when we carry assets and liabilities at cost less accumulated depreciation or amortization.

fair value = this is when we carry assets and liabilities at amount that they could be exchanged for at arms length between market participants

Part b

Historical Cost

Merits : Value are easy to obtain since they are generated internally

Demerits : Is not very accurate.

Fair Value

Merits : Accurate method as it reflects market situation

Demerit : Costly as data and information is obtained externally

Part c

Assets : Investment Property and Financial assets measured through Profit and Loss

Liabilities : Bonds

Part d

Income is shown more accurately and eliminates biases form estimates.

Explanation:

Historical Method carries assets and liabilities at cost less accumulated depreciation or amortization while Fair Value Model carries assets and liabilities at amount that they could be exchanged for at arms length between market participants

answer; /// i believe that the correct answer is ( contemporary crm)

answer: b) the us is the leading importer but not the leading exporter.

extra info:

the u.s is the largest importer but it is not the largest exporter as china sits on the top of the table when it comes to leading exporters.

but u.s is not far from first,

they rank in 2nd globally as the worlds largest exporter.

happy to

pls mark as brainliest