Please help! The Prince-Robbins partnership has the following capital account balances on January 1, 2021:

Prince, Capital $ 160,000
Robbins, Capital 150,000

Prince is allocated 80 percent of all profits and losses with the remaining 20 percent assigned to Robbins after interest of 8 percent is given to each partner based on beginning capital balances.

On January 2, 2021, Jeffrey invests $91,000 cash for a 20 percent interest in the partnership. This transaction is recorded by the goodwill method. After this transaction, 8 percent interest is still to go to each partner. Profits and losses will then be split as follows: Prince (50 percent), Robbins (30 percent), and Jeffrey (20 percent). In 2021, the partnership reports a net income of $33,000.

Prepare the journal entry to record Jeffrey’s entrance into the partnership on January 2, 2021.

Prepare a schedule showing how the 2021 net income allocation to the partners should be determined.

David burdick is the ceo of acme bubblegum, a successful public company. as one of the cofounders of the company, burdick has enjoyed speaking and writing about the success of acme bubblegum for several years. typically, he speaks at conferences or directly to the press, but recently, he has been blogging about his firm anonymously. specifically, he defended a recent advertising campaign that was unpopular among consumers and pointedly attacked one of acme bubblegum’s competitors. burdick deeply enjoys his anonymous blogging and believes that none of his readers actually know that he works for acme bubblegum.should burdick be allowed to praise his company’s performance anonymously online? should he be allowed to attack his competitors without disclosing his relationship with the company? how would you feel if the ceo of a company at which you shopped was secretly writing criticisms of his or her competition? how would you feel if you knew a writer for your favorite blog was actually closely involved in a company that the blog discussed? 1. define the ethical issue? 2. who are the primary stakeholders? 3. what are the possible alternatives? 4. how could you evaluate the ethical implications of the alternative actions (use appropriate decision rules)? 5. what action would you recommend and why?