Item3 10 points my work Check My Work button is not enabled Item 3 Consider a three-factor APT model. The factors and associated risk premiums are: Factor Risk Premium (%) Change in gross national product (GNP) +6.3 Change in energy prices 0.7 Change in long-term interest rates +2.7 Calculate expected rates of return on the following stocks. The risk-free interest rate is 4.3%. A stock whose return is uncorrelated with all three factors. (Enter your answer as a percent rounded to 1 decimal place.) A stock with average exposure to each factor (i. e., with b = 1 for each). (Enter your answer as a percent rounded to 1 decimal place.) A pure-play energy stock with high exposure to the energy factor (b = 2.4) but zero exposure to the other two factors. (Enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places.) An aluminum company stock with average sensitivity to changes in interest rates and GNP, but negative exposure of b = –1.7 to the energy factor. (The aluminum company is energy-intensive and suffers when energy prices rise.) (Enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places.)

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.