MC Qu. 12-67 The following information was taken from... The following information was taken from the segmented income statement of Restin, Inc., and the company's three divisions: Restin, Inc. Los Angeles Division Bay Area Division Central Valley Division Revenues $ 1,216,000 $ 352,000 $ 387,000 $ 477,000 Variable operating expenses 683,600 193,600 215,000 275,000 Controllable fixed expenses 267,000 84,000 94,000 89,000 Noncontrollable fixed expenses 117,000 34,000 39,000 44,000 In addition, the company incurred common fixed costs of $23,700. Assume that the Los Angeles division increases its promotion expense, a controllable fixed cost, by $27,100. As a result, revenues increased by $70,400. If variable expenses are tied directly to revenues, the new Los Angeles segment contribution margin is: Multiple Choice $44,980. $96,100 $71,450. $69,000. $41,900.

Asavings account that pays interest every 3 months is said to have a interest period

According to ceo heidi ganahl, camp bow wow requires a strong and consistent corporate culture to keep all local franchise owners "on the same page" and to follow a common template for the business and brand. this culture could become detrimental over time because: (a) strong consistent cultures are inflexible and incapable of adapting to environmental change (b) strong consistent cultures are too flexible and capable of adapting to environmental change (c) strong consistent cultures don’t perform well in any environment (d) the passing of time provides stability and predictability for businesses

Which of the following is likely not a benefit of requiring a grand jury to listen to and examine all of the evidence against a person suspected of committing a serious crime and then independently deciding whether or not to hand down an indictment? 1.the grand jury system provides the accused another safeguard against being sent to trial and facing conviction based on flawed evidence. 2.the members of the grand jury are drawn from the community and are empowered to render independent decisions about whether or not the government has collected enough evidence to bring an individual to trial. 3.the grand jury’s decision can provide prosecutors insight into what is necessary to build a sufficient case if a similar crime is presented later. 4.the grand jury is impaneled to rubber-stamp prosecutors’ cases, which makes it possible for more cases to reach trial.