Business, 12.10.2021 01:00 joyceandtrey2781

On June 1, 2013, Decker orally guaranteed the payment of a $5,000 note Decker's cousin owed Baker. Decker's agreement with Baker provided that Decker's guaranty would terminate in 18 months. On June 3, 2013, Baker wrote Decker confirming Decker's guaranty. Decker did not object to the confirmation. On August 23, 2013, Decker's cousin defaulted on the note and Baker demanded that Decker honor the guaranty. Decker refused. Which of the following statements is correct? a) Decker is liable under the oral guaranty bc Decker did not object to Baker's June 3 letter.
b) Decker is not liable under the oral guaranty bc it expired more than one year after June 1.
c) Decker is liable under the oral guaranty bc Baker demanded payment within one year of the date the guaranty was given.
d) Decker is not liable under the oral guaranty bc Decker's promise was not in writing.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 04:00

Which law would encourage more people to become homeowners but not encourage risky loans that could end in foreclosure? options: offering first time homebuyers tax-free accounts to save for down payments requiring all mortgages to be more affordable, interest-only loans outlawing home inspections and appraisals by mortgage companies limiting rent increases to less than 2% a year

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 10:20

Sye chase started and operated a small family architectural firm in 2016. the firm was affected by two events: (1) chase provided $25,000 of services on account, and (2) he purchased $2,800 of supplies on account. there were $250 of supplies on hand as of december 31, 2016. record the two transactions in the accounts. record the required year-end adjusting entry to reflect the use of supplies and the required closing entries. post the entries in the t-accounts and prepare a post-closing trial balance.

Answers: 1

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 13:30

On january 2, well co. purchased 10% of rea, inc.’s outstanding common shares for $400,000, which equaled the carrying amount and the fair value of the interest purchased in rea’s net assets. well did not elect the fair value option. because well is the largest single shareholder in rea, and well’s officers are a majority on rea’s board of directors, well exercises significant influence over rea. rea reported net income of $500,000 for the year and paid dividends of $150,000. in its december 31 balance sheet, what amount should well report as investment in rea?

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 17:30

Google started as one of many internet search engines, amazon started as an online book seller, and ebay began as a site where people could sell used personal items in auctions. these firms have grown to be so large and dominant that they are facing antitrust scrutiny from competition regulators in the us and elsewhere. did these online giants grow by fairly beating competition, or did they use unfair advantages? are there any clouds on the horizon for these firms -- could they face diseconomies of scale or diseconomies of scope as they continue to grow? if so, what factors may limit their continued growth?

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

On June 1, 2013, Decker orally guaranteed the payment of a $5,000 note Decker's cousin owed Baker. D...

Questions