Identify at least two points in domino's article where she might have given way to accusation

I believe the two points we can use are:
- Monaghan doesn’t own Domios’s (and hasn’t for years) 
- it’s Domino’s Farms that’s suing
Both of these points could lead to money laundering by transferring  value from one establishment to another and would be considered as a fraud attempt for costumers and the stakeholders of the domin's companies.

The two points that could be used are:

1.       Monaghan hasn’t owned Domino’s for years.

2.       Domino’s Farms is the one suing

These points could lead to fraudulent and money laundering charges which will endanger the stakeholders as well as their customers.

Nothing will happen.maybe some more oxygen will be saved.but the answer is no.