subject
Business, 31.07.2019 22:30 BreBreDoeCCx

Janet reasons, "it is wrong to lie. however, it is okay to overstate my expense account on my recent business trip because i need the money, and my company has not given me a raise in the past year." in this scenario, janet is an employee who views ethics as

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 16:00
2standard deviation a particular telephone number is used to receive both voice calls and fax messages. suppose that 25% of the incoming calls involve fax messages, and consider a sample of 25 incoming calls. (a) what is the expected number of calls among the 25 that involve a fax message?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:30
Alandowner entered into a written agreement with a real estate broker whereby the broker would receive a commission of 10% of the sale price if he procured a "ready, willing, and able buyer" for the landowner's property and if the sale actually proceeded through closing. the broker found a buyer who agreed in writing to buy the property from the landowner for $100,000, the landowner's asking price. the buyer put up $6,000 as a down payment. the agreement between the landowner and the buyer contained a liquidated damages clause providing that, if the buyer defaulted by failing to tender the balance due of $94,000 at the closing date, damages would be 10% of the purchase price. the landowner included that clause because she was counting on using the proceeds of the sale for a business venture that would likely net her at least $10,000. the buyer became seriously ill and defaulted. when he recovered, he demanded that the landowner return his $6,000, and the landowner refused. the broker also demanded the $6,000 from the landowner and was refused. the broker and the buyer filed separate suits against the landowner, with the buyer pleading impossibility of performance. the two cases are consolidated into a single case. how should the court rule as to the disposition of the $6,000?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:20
Stock a has a beta of 1.2 and a standard deviation of 20%. stock b has a beta of 0.8 and a standard deviation of 25%. portfolio p has $200,000 consisting of $100,000 invested in stock a and $100,000 in stock b. which of the following statements is correct? (assume that the stocks are in equilibrium.) (a) stock b has a higher required rate of return than stock a. (b) portfolio p has a standard deviation of 22.5%. (c) portfolio p has a beta equal to 1.0. (d) more information is needed to determine the portfolio's beta. (e) stock a's returns are less highly correlated with the returns on most other stocks than are b's returns.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:00
You are given the following information about aggregate demand at the existing price level for an economy: (1) consumption = $400 billion, (2) investment = $40 billion, (3) government purchases = $90 billion, and (4) net export = $25 billion. if the full-employment level of gdp for this economy is $600 billion, then what combination of actions would be most consistent with closing the gdp gap here?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Janet reasons, "it is wrong to lie. however, it is okay to overstate my expense account on my recent...
Questions
question
Physics, 03.12.2020 14:40
question
Engineering, 03.12.2020 14:40
question
Chemistry, 03.12.2020 14:40
question
Chemistry, 03.12.2020 14:40
question
Biology, 03.12.2020 14:40
Questions on the website: 13722361