if the solid, purple line represents a prey population
(e. g., rabbits) and the dashed, red line represents a predator population (e. g., coyotes), which of the following statements is a reasonable conclusion based on the graph?
a.
an increase in the predator population is always immediately preceded by an increase in the prey population.
b.
there is no correlation that can be made between the predator and prey populations.
c.
an increase in the prey population is always immediately preceded by an increase in the predator population.
d.
a decrease in the predator population is always immediately followed by a decrease in the prey population.

b. accuracy of the data matters alot more than its number of digits, organization or amount of detail. quantitative observation is more accepted than the qualitative observation.

answer: i dont know the answer but this might

explanation:

l

it can be observed without changing the identity of the object.

it depends on what substance you're talking about as well as many other factors. in quantum mechanics, the observation of particles affects the observers ability to measure certain properties. for example: you can know the velocity of a particle, but you can't know it's position; or you can know it's position, but not it's velocity. it's like trying to find out where a grain of sand is by throwing other grains of sand at it. once you find out where it is, it's been moved. it's also like trying to find an answer to the question of whether or not a tree falling in a forest makes a sound if nobody is there to hear it. paradoxically, the only way to find out is to be there and hear it.