subject
Chemistry, 17.09.2019 19:30 laura52677

Often, complex molecules are described in terms of their atomic masses. but what is more relevant in biology is how they take up space. (for proteins, their shapes are particularly important.) let's see if we can get an approximate idea of the physical size of a protein molecule by doing various estimations. an important molecule in the internal mechanisms of cells is actin. this is measured as having a mass of about 42 kda (= 42,000 daltons, where 12 daltons is defined as the mass of a carbon atom). let's see if we can estimate how big it is using very crude estimates. of course eventually we will want to know how big it actually is and what its shape is, but getting a scale would us determine what measurement tools might be appropriate. in order to estimate the size of actin, we'll first make an estimate of how many atoms it has, then, using the average size of an atom, we'll consider different models of how it might be arranged to get an idea of its size. a. we could look up the chemical composition of actin to get exactly how many atoms it contains. but let's see how "the estimation game" does instead. actin is a biological molecule, so it's probably made up of mostly carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and hydrogen, with a few other stray atoms tossed in. use an "average sized biological atom" to estimate the number of atoms in actin. b. given the radius of an average atom let's consider a simple model of actin. suppose actin is tightly packed into a sphere or cube. for estimation purposes we could model each atom as a cube. if you built up a cube of the total number of atoms you found in a, what would be the dimensions of the cube?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Chemistry

question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 01:40
Darla claims that the first periodic table developed by mendeleev was not completely accurate, so it is not useful at all. harmony argues that it establish the periodic table we use today, making it more credible. who is correct and why? darla is correct, because a model that has any mistakes should be thrown out. darla is correct, because a good model would not need to change. harmony is correct, because mendeleev’s model had all of the information correct in the first version. harmony is correct, because mendeleev’s model made predictions that came true.
Answers: 1
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 03:50
What is the temperature of one mole of helium gas at stp?
Answers: 3
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 05:10
How many miles of water are produced if 5.43 mol pbo2 are consumed
Answers: 1
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 10:00
Ahydrogen atom has 1 electron. how many bonds can hydrogen form? a) 1 b) 2 c) 3 d) 4 e) 5
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Often, complex molecules are described in terms of their atomic masses. but what is more relevant in...
Questions
question
Physics, 01.09.2019 23:30
question
Mathematics, 01.09.2019 23:30
Questions on the website: 13722363