In this reaction a scheme of a chemical reaction. the reactants are two molecules, one of which consists of a and b, and the other consists of c and d. the products are two molecules, one of which consists of a and c, and the other consists of b and d. the energy of molecules ab and cd is higher than the energy of molecules ac and bd.
(a)- the products have been rearranged to form reactants
(b)-the products have less potential energy than the reactants
(c)-cd is a product
(d)-ac is a reactant
(e)-entropy has decreased

The answer to your question is: correct answer is A

Explanation:

Reaction

                  AB   +   CD   ⇒    AC   +   BD

(a)- the products have been rearranged to form reactants  This option is correcrt because it is a double substitution reaction, and the reactants interchange cations and anions to form new compounds.

(b)-the products have less potential energy than the reactants  I think this option is wrong because products have less activation energy than the reactants not potential energy.

(c)-CD is a product  This option is wrong, CD is a reactant

(d)-AC is a reactant  This option is wrong, AC is a product

(e)-entropy has decreased , to know this we the data, and the question do not give enough information about this.

when—without warning—something provokes your anger, you may struggle not to succumb to it. since what typically makes you mad is feeling powerless in the face of what seems unfair, your anger is mostly an attempt at a “quick fix” to right the balance. it’s as though you’re raising a fist in protest, proclaiming that you’re not going to capitulate to such injustice.

there are, however, a multitude of problems related to this immediate, push-back reaction of anger. and probably the key one is that almost never does it resolve the issue that gave rise to it. such reactive anger is probably best understood as self-defeating. as david burns, the author of the seminal self- book feeling good, observes: if realistically, acting on your anger is to make any sense, it needs to meet two criteria—which, in almost every case, is frankly impossible. that is, your anger must:

be directed toward a person who has intentionally (and needlessly) behaved in a hurtful way toward you; and

be beneficial or advantageous to you (i.e., assist you in achieving a desired goal).

i think you’ll agree that only rarely can you claim that your anger is both warranted and , whether to yourself or the relationship.

so let me offer you a two-step alternative to abandoning your better judgment and giving in to the temptation of anger—one that should neutralize your anger in seconds. or, when you’re really angry, in minutes.

but keep in mind that you must really want to execute these steps, be sufficiently motivated to perform them. which means overcoming more unconscious resistance than you might ever have imagined. because there are many immediate “advantages” of anger that can interfere with your resolve, i’ll suggest a few of them that might interfere with your employing this powerful method to rid yourself of counter-productive anger.

explanation:

? you expect us to answer this? ? this is your schoolwork, i don't think we can with this, i think it would considering being