A3.35cm air bubble forms in a deep lake at a depth where the temperature is 19.2 degrees celcuis and the pressure is 1564mmhg. the bubble rises to a depth where the temperatuer is now 26.5 degrees celsius and the pressure is 825.5 mmhg. assuming the amount of air in the buble has not changed, calculate its new volume

it is important to conserve water because there is very limited amount of freshwater here on earth and if we are not smart about how we use it we will only be runnning out of our supply faster than neccessarry.

the movement of aircraft through clouds can even cause lightning strikes. a single lightning event is a "flash", which is a complex, multi-stage explosively ejected.

explanation:

and the person below goggled it.

mark as brainliest

u i forgot the answer?

1. the question asks the most appropriate, which seems to rule out "all of the above." your choice appears to be the correct one.

2. the protocol described is good for identifying correlation, but not cause and effect. for cause/effect, you need to devise a protocol that will assign the treatment (or not) to groups that have essentially the same "demographics" with respect to all the other variables. your choice regarding control group seems appropriate. random assignment of treatment (choice d) may be appropriate also. (i think you can argue that b and d are just different descriptions of the same method.)

3. d will randomize the birds, but may not guarantee there are 10 in each group. e will do both, so seems the better choice.

comment on question 2

based on the problem statement, it seems clear that confident, attentive drivers are more likely to use daytime running lights. so, the protocol might need to be devised in such a way that the lights would be turned on or off without the driver's knowledge. (an attentive driver will figure it out.) assigning a confident, attentive driver to a group required to drive without running lights might mess with his/her confidence and attentiveness. you don't want your experiment to do that. (nor do you want the experiment to subject a driver to greater risk of accident as a consequence of driving without running lights.) experiments involving human safety are always problematic.