Did the data support Martha's hypothesis? Use evidence to explain why or why not. if you feel the data were inconclusive, explain why.

Yes, the data supports the researchers hypothesis.

Explanation:

From the given data, in all the cases except the fanning event in females, the fish parents which was fed full ration appeared.

Take for example, 30.7 mouthing events in males given full ration as opposed to 24.5 events when they were fed on half ration.

a. the law of proportion states the combination of 2 atoms in a specific ratio to produce multiple compounds such as the given statement of question ‘1st compound contains 88.8 % cu ’ indicates 88.8 g of cu is present along with 11.2 g oxygen in 100 g of compound whereas the statement ‘2st compound contains 79.9 % cu ’ indicates 79.9 g of cu is present along with 20.1 g oxygen in 100 g of compound

1st compound contains 88.8 g cu

for cu

m = 63 g /mol

atomic % = 88.8 /63 = 1.42

for o

m = 16 g /mol

atomic % = 11.2 /16 = 0.7

b. the emperical formula of 1st compound is

cu1.4o0.7

cu2o