The nitration of aromatic compounds is a highly exothermic reaction that generally uses catalysts that tend to be corrosive (e. g., HNO3 /H2SO4 ). A less corrosive employs N2 O5 as the nitrating agent as illustrated below: If this reaction is conducted in an adiabatic CSTR, what is the reactor volume and space time necessary to achieve 35 percent conversion of N2O5? The reaction rate is first order in A and second order in B. Data: HRX = -370.1 kJ/mol CpA = 84.5 J/(mol-K) CpB = 137 J/(mol-K) Cpc = 170 J/(mol-K) CpD = 75 J/(mol-K) To = 303 K FAo = 10 mol/min FBo = 30 mol/min v = 1000 L/min CAo =0.01 mol/L

-370.1 kJ/mol CpA = 84.5 J/(mol-K) CpB = 137 J/(mol-K) Cpc = 170 J/(mol-K) CpD = 75 J/(mol-K) To = 303 K FAo = 10 mol/min FBo = 30 mol/min v = 1000 L/min CAo =0.01 mol/L

Explanation:

The nitration of aromatic compounds is a highly exothetion that generally uses catalysts that tend to be corrosive (e.g., HNO3 /H2SO4 ). A less corrosive employs N2 O5 as the nitrating agent as illustrated below: If this reaction is conducted in an adiabatic CSTR, what is the reactor volume and space time necessary to achieve 35 percent conversion of N2O5? The reaction rate is first order in A and second order in B. Data: HRX = -370.1 kJ/mol CpA = 84.5 J/(mol-K) CpB = 137 J/(mol-K) Cpc = 170 J/(mol-K) CpD = 75 J/(mol-K) To = 303 K FAo = 10 mol/min FBo = 30 mol/min v = 1000 L/min CAo =0.01 mol/L

Hold on, our servers are swamped. Wait for your answer to fully load.

rmic

answer: the primary difference between a hypothesis and a theory is that b hypothesis is falsifiable, but a theory has been proven to be correct. theory is an explanation of something that is happening but hypothesis is a guess of something that can happen

explanation:

catya that's not even a b or c