Which option draws the correct conclusion from the following case study? A patient with sickle-cell anemia and a fever goes to the emergency room and is given Tylenol to reduce
the fever. The patient has seizures and dies after taking the Tylenol. The physician writes up this case as
an interesting outcome for a patient with sickle-cell anemia.
The case study's validity is obvious because it describes a real-life situation.
The case study was influenced by bias, and led to incorrect conclusions being drawn
The case study was not intended to produce a generalized conclusion about treatment
Upon reading this case study, physicians should stop treating sickle cell patients with fevers using Tylenol

I believe the answer The case study was influenced by bias, and led to incorrect conclusions being drawn. plz correct me if I am wrong

Explanation:

answer : one can design an experiment using a liquid and an additive that can be added to the liquid and observe the chemical changes in the reaction species.

one would need a beaker which is filled with a known amount of the liquid in which thermometer is placed to measure the temperature changes; after addition of the additive to the liquid solution one can note down the temperature change and find whether the reaction is endothermic or exothermic in nature. by subtracting the initial temperature value with the final temperature one can find the temperature changes.

various combinations of liquid and additive can be used. liquid in this case can be a known quantity of water and additives can be epsom salt or without epsom salt the experiment can be conducted to notice the changes. water and ice, hydrogen peroxide and dry yeast, vinegar and baking soda,etc.