Some people argue that a policy of putting out wildfires is having a negative long-term effect on the number and strength of wildfires. Suggest why this could be the case.

The answer to this is simple.  

There is a school of thought that believes that natural fires are necessary.

Explanation

They are required to reduce the density of the forests that are so thick that when they eventually burn, the effects are usually catastrophic. According to one source, some of these forests are over a hundred years old. When eventually these kinds of forests catch fire, they become very hard to manage and the destruction the leave are usually worse off than if they had not been allowed to so heavy and impenetrable.  

Another reason put forward by this school of thought is that the countries who own these forests have politicised wildfires using them as an excuse to attract international funding/assistance because the fires are depleting the worlds protective greenery/earth biggest natural oxygen factory.

Cheers!

when—without warning—something provokes your anger, you may struggle not to succumb to it. since what typically makes you mad is feeling powerless in the face of what seems unfair, your anger is mostly an attempt at a “quick fix” to right the balance. it’s as though you’re raising a fist in protest, proclaiming that you’re not going to capitulate to such injustice.

there are, however, a multitude of problems related to this immediate, push-back reaction of anger. and probably the key one is that almost never does it resolve the issue that gave rise to it. such reactive anger is probably best understood as self-defeating. as david burns, the author of the seminal self- book feeling good, observes: if realistically, acting on your anger is to make any sense, it needs to meet two criteria—which, in almost every case, is frankly impossible. that is, your anger must:

be directed toward a person who has intentionally (and needlessly) behaved in a hurtful way toward you; and

be beneficial or advantageous to you (i.e., assist you in achieving a desired goal).

i think you’ll agree that only rarely can you claim that your anger is both warranted and , whether to yourself or the relationship.

so let me offer you a two-step alternative to abandoning your better judgment and giving in to the temptation of anger—one that should neutralize your anger in seconds. or, when you’re really angry, in minutes.

but keep in mind that you must really want to execute these steps, be sufficiently motivated to perform them. which means overcoming more unconscious resistance than you might ever have imagined. because there are many immediate “advantages” of anger that can interfere with your resolve, i’ll suggest a few of them that might interfere with your employing this powerful method to rid yourself of counter-productive anger.

explanation:

i believe it is-

d.) gravity pulled particles of dust and gas together to form planets.