Two scientists write a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submit it to a scientific journal. Several months later, the publisher sends them back the paper. Many comments from several fellow scientists are attached.
Which step will the authors of the paper most likely take next?
They will change their research to a different topic and start all over again
O They will alter the data to match the results that their peers were expecting.
O They will incorporate the suggestions from their peers and resubmit the paper.
They will sue the journal for delaying their research and not printing the paper

explanation:

two years ago, when picking flowers in the mountains back of yosemite valley, i found a book. it was blotted and storm-beaten; all of its outer pages were mealy and crumbly. the paper seemed to dissolve like the snow beneath which it had been buried, however; many of the inner pages were well preserved. and although all were more or less stained and torn, whole chapters were easily readable. this is the condition of the great open book of yosemite glaciers today; its granite pages have been torn and blurred by the same storms that wasted the castaway book.

two years ago, when picking flowers in the mountains back of yosemite valley; i found a book. it was blotted and storm-beaten, all of its outer pages were mealy and crumbly. the paper seemed to dissolve like the snow beneath which it had been buried, however, many of the inner pages were well preserved. and although all were more or less stained and torn; whole chapters were easily readable. this is the condition of the great open book of yosemite glaciers today, its granite pages have been torn and blurred by the same storms that wasted the castaway book.