Theorists try to find ways to explain human behavior in rational ways. It seems irrational to break rules, if we want to maintain social order. We are largely constrained by the rules and obliged to behave in a particular way or to avoid certain behaviors. What motivates people to break social rules? Do you think powerful and famous people tend to break more rules? Is it worth breaking these rules? No Response(s) Be the first to respond to the Discussion topic!

See explanation

Explanation:

According to Burgess (1996); 'We don't break rules because it 'doesn't feel right' to do so. Some elements of personality can determine whether we will break rules or not, particularly when the moral/social-conventional distinction is taken into consideration'.

If an individual has the urge to behave in a manner that transgresses social rules,  personality characteristics now come into play here. Personality traits determines whether the  individual  considers him/herself as bound by the rules. Some people will follow the rules absolutely while some only follow  rules that they consider important, a small proportion will not follow any rule that prevents them from achieving their set objectives.

Famous people become carried away with affluence and position and tend to break more rules since they believe that they will always get away with it because of whom they are.

Irrespective of the circumstances, it is never worth it to break a rule. We always have to see ourselves as bound by rules as part of our social responsibility.

assuming that your periodic table has eighteen columns, you should highlight   the four elements in the third column from the left of the table.

neutral atoms of elements after calcium contain d electrons. the energy of d orbitals of a particular main shell lies between the energy of the s and p orbitals of the next main shell. for example, electrons in the have energy higher than those in the orbital while lower than those of the orbital.

by the aufbau principle, electrons fill orbitals one at a time, starting from those of the lowest energy. the orbital is therefore filled right after orbitals and before orbitals.  

potassium has electron configuration and calcium . the s orbital of a main shell holds a maximum of two electrons. the next element would thus have the electron configuration and satisfy the requirements.

a neutral atom of the element contains three electrons on top of the most recent noble gas element. it should thus be placed in the third column of the periodic table. both scandium and yttrium would satisfy the conditions. an aufbau diagram indicates that the 4f orbital is filled before the 5d. however, it appears that exceptions exists for both lanthanum and actinium. neutral atoms of the two d-block elements also demonstrate the and should be highlighted as well.

< > according to newton's third law of motion, forces always act in equal but opposite pairs. another way of saying this is for every action, there is an equal but opposite reaction.< >