I don’t understand this at all! Please help!

Why do you suppose the structural polysaccharide cellulose does not contain branches? why do you suppose the structural polysaccharide cellulose does not contain branches? branches in the molecule would generate side chains that would almost certainly make it difficult to pack the cellulose molecules into globules, thereby decreasing the flexibility and strength of the globules. branches in the molecule would generate side chains that would almost certainly make it difficult to pack the cellulose molecules into microfibrils, thereby increasing the rigidity and strength of the microfibrils. branches in the molecule would generate side chains that would almost certainly make it difficult to pack the cellulose molecules into globules, thereby increasing the flexibility and strength of the globules. branches in the molecule would generate side chains that would almost certainly make it difficult to pack the cellulose molecules into microfibrils, thereby decreasing the rigidity and strength of the microfibrils.

Define a is a tiny pavket of energy

Nitrogen dioxide decomposes according to the reaction 2 no2(g) ⇌ 2 no(g) + o2(g) where kp = 4.48 × 10−13 at a certain temperature. if 0.70 atm of no2 is added to a container and allowed to come to equilibrium, what are the equilibrium partial pressures of no(g) and o2(g)