Linda performed the following trials in an experiment. Trial 1: Heat 30.0 grams of water at 0 °C to a final temperature of 40.0 °C.
Trial 2: Heat 40.0 grams of water at 30.0 °C to a final temperature of 40.0 °C.
Which statement is true about the experiments? (5 points)
The heat absorbed in Trial 1 is about 1,674 ) greater than the heat absorbed in Trial 2.
O The heat absorbed in Trial 1 is about 3,347) greater than the heat absorbed in Trial 2
O The same amount of heat is absorbed in both the experiments because the heat absorbed depends only on the final temperature,
The same amount of heat is absorbed in both the experiments because the product of mass, specific heat capacity, and change in temperature are the
same.

O The heat absorbed in Trial 1 is about 3,347) greater than the heat absorbed in Trial 2

Explanation:

Using the formula as follows;

Q = m × c × ∆T

Where;

Q = amount of heat absorbed (J)

m = mass of substance (g)

c = specific heat of water = 4.18J/g°C

∆T = change in temperature (°C)

* For trial 1:

m = 30g

∆T = 40°C - 0°C = 40°C

Q = 30 × 4.18 × 40

Q = 5016J

* For trial 2:

m = 40g

∆T = 40°C - 30°C = 10°C

Q = 40 × 4.18 × 10

Q = 1672J

From the above results, it is clear that the amount of heat absorbed in trial 1 (5016J) is greater than that absorbed in trial 2(1672J) with a difference of 3344.

2fe + 3h2so4 -> fe2(so4)3 + 3h2

it is necessary to balance equations in order to get the proper amount of reactants as well as products in order not to make a miscalculation.

you cannot change the subscripts as that would change the substance itself. for instance, diatomic elements such as h2 only have the subscript two when a gas. another example would be so4, if you were to change the subscript, the element would no longer be sulfate.

we change the coefficients instead as that only changes the number of molecules rather than the substance itself.

hope this !