As we learned, astrology and phrenology are considered pseudosciences because they are either not testable or cannot be verified objectively. Think of one other discipline that could be considered a pseudoscience and explain why the content would not be testable or able to be verified objectively. What principles of science (like facts, laws, and theories) might help explain why similar investigations conducted in many parts of the world could result in the same outcome?

What makes the peer-review process important to our society? Explain your answer.

Give an example of a question that can be answered by science and a question that could be better answered by philosophy.

Why are concerns like safety and recycling important in astronomy, even though the research is often not conducted in a traditional lab?