Suppose someone designed a stack abstract data type in which the function top returned an access path (or pointer) rather than returning a copy of the top element. this is not a true data abstraction. why? give an example that illustrates the problem.

Write a full class definition for a class named player , and containing the following members: a data member name of type string .a data member score of type int .a member function called setname that accepts a parameter and assigns it to name . the function returns no value.a member function called setscore that accepts a parameter and assigns it to score . the function returns no value.a member function called getname that accepts no parameters and returns the value of name .a member function called getscore that accepts no parameters and returns the value of score .this is what i have, aparently this is wrong: class player{private: string name; int score; public: void player: : setname (string n){name =n; }void player: : setscore (int s){score = s; }string player: : getname (){return name; }int player: : getscore (){return score; }};

Alcohol’s affects on the cornea and lens of the eye make it more difficult

What is the item which could be matched with a statement below? software installed on a computer that produces pop-up ads using your browser an example of social engineering malware loads itself before the os boot is complete type of spyware that tracks your keystrokes, including passwords windows key + l the practice of tricking people into giving out private information or allowing unsafe programs into the network or computer when someone who is unauthorized follows the employee through a secured entrance to a room or building a type of malware that tricks you into opening it by substituting itself for a legitimate program a computer that has been hacked, and the hacker is using the computer to run repetitive software in the background without the user's knowledge an infestation designed to copy itself repeatedly to memory, on drive space, or on a network