An intranet is an external network. truefalse

False

Explanation:

An intranet is not an external network.

An intranet is an internal network which is established by an organization for its own use.

External people can not access the Intranet unlike the internet which is accessible to every one.

An organization owns a private network which is called an intranet. Private means that the network is accessible to all those employed within the organization, staff of the company.

Intranet exists only within the company and indicates the following.

1.The company establishes its own network inside the company so that the staff of the company can access and exchange information among themselves.

2.The staff can communicate and have discussions on the network.

3.The information is not accessible to outside parties such as customers, stakeholders, and others.

4.The network is not accessible and does not exists for the outside parties.

5.The term intra means inside and net means network.

Intranet leads to the following benefits.

1.The staff can view and exchange information with more ease and comfort and in less time.

2.Faster access to information increases employee output. Employees can perform better and have more time to focus on their work.

3.Communication among the employees is encouraged and made easy. Any one can communicate with every one in the company.

4.More communication leads to better working relationships among the staff. Cooperation and collaboration among the staff is given a boost.

5.Staff can give their input for the type of information to be held in the respository. This serves as the single point of information which enables smooth work flow.

Intranet also has some drawbacks.

The employees can take undue advantage of this communication channel for personal communications and information exchange.

Unproductive communication can only hamper the culture of the workplace.

Guidelines should be enforced to avoid unnecessary communication.

answer; i believe the correct answer is (expression); good luck

there is no universally accepted definition of art. although commonly used to describe something of beauty, or a skill which produces an aesthetic result, there is no clear line in principle between (say) a unique piece of handmade sculpture, and a mass-produced but visually attractive item. we might say that art requires thought - some kind of creative impulse - but this raises more questions: for example, how much thought is required? if someone flings paint at a canvas, hoping by this action to create a work of art, does the result automatically constitute art?