The UDP server described needed only one socket, whereas the TCP server needed two sockets. Why? If the TCP server were to support n simultaneous connections, each from a different client host, how many sockets would the TCP server need?

The UDP server described needed only one socket, whereas the TCP server needed two sockets because:

UDP uses one socket and TCP requires two sockets in a transmission because UDP is a way one connectionless protocol but TCP is connection oriented.

The TCP server that supports n simultaneous connections would require n sockets, ranging from 1 through n.

Explanation:

A socket is a fusion of a port number and a source IP address using a colon.

UDP is a transport layer protocol that is unreliable, because it does not need to establish connection to transmit packets and does not retransmit dropped packets. TCP is another transport layer protocol that is reliable, establish connection and retransmit dropped packets.

For a UDP, only one socket would be created to transmission. A socket on the client side and server side would be created in TCP connection. A server can have multiple sockets for one or different transmission protocols.

it would be a. excessive network collisions or d. slow connectivity between devices those would be my answer.