Consider the following method, which is intended to return the number of local maximum values in an array Local maximum values are array elements that are greater than both adjacent array elements. The first and last elements of an array have only a single adjacent element, so neither the first nor the last array element is counted by this method. For example, an array containing the values (3. 9. 7, 4, 10, 12, 3, 8) has two local maximum values: 9 and 12 public static int count Peaks(int[] data) int nunPeaks - e; for (/" missing Loap header */ ) if (data[p. 1] data p + 1]) nunPeaks++; return numeaks, Which of the following can replace /* missing loop header / so the method count Peaks works as intended?

a. int p - data. Length - 1p > ; P-
b. int p - P < data. length; ptt int p .
c. p < data. length - 1; put int p = 1;
d. p

some have built technology like spoofed call blockers into their networks, so there's nothing you would even have to install.

this happens because the number is known for scamming, they don't want it to me known as "scam likely." perhaps it's just a telemarketer. maybe it's an identity thief. it might even be a scam artist.  

either way, "scam likely" is probably not an old friend whose number you forgot that you saved. it's your wireless carrier's way of letting you know: answer at your own risk.

explanation:

to combat the seemingly rising epidemic of spam callers in the u.s., the nation's four major wireless carriers have been trying out new methods to reduce the number of unsolicited calls americans receive each day.

some have built technology like spoofed call blockers into their networks, so there's nothing you would even have to install.

hope this . mark me brainliest.

what class is it and how much will you pay?

i really dont know but i need bad

explanation:

me im struggling with math