Given this resume (shown below), answer the following questions. 1. what is the weakest section (introduction, body, or conclusion) of ms. jackson's letter? explain in complete sentences. 2. would you hire ms. jackson for a job at the fbi? explain, in complete sentences, why or why not.

1) Conclusion b/c of the words "a quick review" kinda like bossing the person reading the resume.

2)Yes; b/c he sounds ambitious with the right skills.

1. The weakest section of Ms. Jackson's letter is the conclusion.

The language used in the conclusion is not as formal as a request to a superior should be. The word choice makes her request sound too familiar and informal. Also, instead of presenting herself as available at all times to answer any questions the reader may have, she states that she will communicate in a week, making her sound too self-assured and even smug.

3. Yes, I would hire Ms. Jackson.

Ms. Jackson portrais very convincingly all her abilities and qualifications for the job. She provides good references and names of officers that will attest to her adequacy for the possition. She also shows herself as a respectful, well educated candidate which would convince me to give her the job.

the correct answer is b. in order to explain a point clearly in an essay, it is always better to include a clear example of your ideas. including an scenario in which a family is affected by consumerism will support your argument as well as supporting details, such as quotations from experts and statistics. option a could be correct, but statistics and quotations are supporting ideas rather than clear explanations. choices c and d are simply inadequate. they do not add information about the effects of consumerism, rather they are strategies for engaging the reader