How does the structure of cicero’s argument in on the commonwealth compare to the structure of hobbes’ argument in leviathan?

The Hobbes' argument in Leviathan calls that civil peace and social unity are best achieved by the stablishment of a commonwealth through social contract. On Cicero's argument the commonwealth is a constutition of the entire people, where they united due to the spirit of congregation which naturally belongs to humans.

In Leviatan, the commonwealth is ruled by a sovereign power responsible for protecting the security of itself and granted absolute authority to ensure the common defense. To Cicero's, the ideal ruler to a commonwealth are the People in all, to ensure the tie of social affection and the public interest, so it can mantains its force.

the support that the author, uses in the article facing our fears is a): a definition of the part of the brain called the amygdala.

he takes neuroscientist joseph ledoux's words by telling that by falling to distinguish between evolutionary old systems located in the amygdala and newer systems, centered in the prefrontal cortex, doctors have conflated non conscious threat circuits in the brain with circuits that underlie the conscious experience of fear. that, the author says, "leads ledoux to the jarring conclusion that the amygdala, a decades-old centerpiece of the brain's fear circuit, does not underlie the conscious feeling of fear".

despite this, the author points out in the article that that is a controversial notion and that evidence, in animal and humans, supports the idea that core emotions can exist outside of conscious awareness.