Claim #1: david likes peanut butter. claim #2: some people who like peanut butter are mean. conclusion: david is a meanie. which best identifies an error in the relevance of this argument? a: the writer is stereotyping david just because he likes peanut butter. b: a preference for or against peanut butter is not a valid way to evaluate an individual's personality. c: the writer has neglected to include a conclusion that explains why david is a meanie. d: it's possible that david is not among the group of people who like peanut butter and are mean.