Fa hard fact or visual representation of a fact is needed, which method of incorporating evidence would be most effective? summarizing providing data paraphrasing quoting

This answer would be providing data or quoting.

Please tell if this is right or wrong.

The answer is: Providing data.

Explanation:

Providing real data will always be the best method of incorporating evidence. Summarizing and paraphrasing will be redundant at some point, you're not getting anywhere but the same place... what you need is to convince, to prove, and these two aren't helpful whatsoever.

Quoting is a good method for adding up to facts, evidence, and data but definitely not as form of a hard fact to convince or prove something. Just to add or/and sum up to what we already have.

this is the answer , p = 1 + (1/10)x

step-by-step explanation:

we have,

at sea level pressure is 1 atmosphere (i.e at x =0, p0=1 atmosphere)

at depth 23 meters , pressure = 3.3 atmosphere

since the pressure increases at constant rate as the depth increases, so we can write a relation as:

p =p0 +   kx   , where p is the pressure  , p0 is the initial pressure, x is the depth and k is constant rate of increasing.

to find constant rate k, plug p = 3.3 , p0 = 1 and x= 23 meters

we get,

  3.3 = 1 + k * 23

k = 2.3 / 23   = 1/10

so we can write the function formula as:   p = 1 + (1/10)x