Ihave to summarize the story “on the rainy river” using this there are the five elements of a story: > character > setting > conflict > resolution > plot writing a summary of a short story, we need to cover these elements and make explicit in our own words what happened relative to these five elements of a story. the following process is a great strategy to do this: 1. write a few sentences – in your own words – stating the main message or gist of the story. 2. write a few sentences about the setting of the story in the context of the story. 3. write a few sentences about the main characters in the context of the story. 4. write a few sentences about the conflict of the story in the context of the story. 5. write several sentences to summarize the sequence of events using transitions effectively: first, then, next, finally, 6. write a few sentences about how the conflict was resolved. 7. write a few sentences restating the the message or gist of the story that began the summary, but this time doing it in a slightly different way with the aim of bringing closure to the summary. when we use a structured outline to summarize in this way, for each short story we read, this way of thinking soon becomes a habit of mind. this strategy aims to grow a learner’s ability to readily make explicit in their own words what happened in a short story, while intentionally covering the essential literary elements of a story. assignment: reread the story use the above steps, and those discussed in the video that we watch in class to write your own summary(in your journals) of "on the rainy river" once you have finished turn it in and i will give you feedback use this feedback to edit your summary once it is returned. can someone me summarize it , i have to turn this in quick while i do other work.

Is "ing" an unstressed or stressed syllable?

Which excerpt from "hills like white elephants" provides the most details about the main characters' lives outside the railway station? click here to read an excerpt.

Read the passage from animal farm. as clover looked down the hillside her eyes filled with tears. if she could have spoken her thoughts, it would have been to say that this was not what they had aimed at when they had set themselves years ago to work for the overthrow of the human race. these scenes of terror and slaughter were not what they had looked forward to on that night when old major first stirred them to rebellion. if she herself had had any picture of the future, it had been of a society of animals set free from hunger and the whip, all equal, each working according to his capacity, the strong protecting the weak, as she had protected the lost brood of ducklings with her foreleg on the night of major's speech. instead—she did not know why—they had come to a time when no one dared speak his mind, when fierce, growling dogs roamed everywhere, and when you had to watch your comrades torn to pieces after confessing to shocking crimes. there was no thought of rebellion or disobedience in her mind. she knew that, even as things were, they were far better off than they had been in the days of jones, and that before all else it was needful to prevent the return of the human beings. whatever happened she would remain faithful, work hard, carry out the orders that were given to her, and accept the leadership of napoleon. but still, it was not for this that she and all the other animals had hoped and toiled. it was not for this that they had built the windmill and faced the bullets of jones's gun. such were her thoughts, though she lacked the words to express them. what was most likely orwell’s purpose for writing this passage? to show that clover is more sensitive to violence than the others to remind readers of major's speech and the original rebellion to present napoleon as a cruel leader unworthy of the animals’ support to represent misled followers and their dashed hopes for better lives