Read the introduction to dan deluca's argument. bob dylan is the songwriter who opened up the doors of possibility to all who followed. he was the mysterious bard with a guitar who sent out a clarion call—first as the acoustic voice of his generation, then as the plugged-in rocker who remained a master of the unexpected for five decades—that the words pop singers sang were worthy of being taken seriously. "dylan was a revolutionary,” bruce springsteen said in his 1988 speech inducting dylan into the rock and roll hall of fame. "the way that elvis freed your body, bob freed your mind.” early masterpieces such as "a hard rain’s a-gonna fall” and "visions of johanna” and "like a rolling stone” fueled a debate: are rock lyrics poetry? the answer must be yes, because on thursday, dylan was awarded the highest honor for a writer: the nobel prize in literature. the swedish academy, in making him the first american winner since novelist toni morrison in 1993, cited him for "having created new poetic expressions within the great american song tradition.” which statement summarizes deluca’s claim? “the way that elvis freed your body, bob freed your mind.” “he was the mysterious bard with a guitar.” “he was . . a master of the unexpected for five decades.” “the swedish academy . . cited him for ‘having created new poetic expressions within the great american song tradition.’”

The statement that best summarizes DeLuca's claim is D. “The Swedish Academy . . . cited him for ‘having created new poetic expressions within the great American song tradition.’”

Throughout his article, he's argumenting that rock and pop songs, and especially Dylan's, ought to be considered poetry and taken seriously because they produced the same effect as high literature, make the reader/listener think and relate and learn about themselves.

The answer is D

Explanation:

i would like to compare these two interpretations of the crucible : 1) eric christ's interretation and wade bradford's interpretation. the main differences between there interretaions is that in the first one you can notice direct link to joseph mccarthy whereas the second one represents how the town is filled with hysteria.the second interpretation shows that author believes that the story   about puritan town in salem is based on actual events while the first example shows the sencible reference to sort of bias.

moon-letters were a method of writing invented by the dwarves. moon-letters were ordinary runes, but written in such a way that they could only be read when the light of the moon shone behind the writing. some moon-letters could be read by any moonlight, but it was possible to make the writing even more secret. more sophisticated moon-letters could only be read by the light of the same shape of moon, or at the same time of year, as when they were written. hope this !