It was her sister josephine who told her, in broken sentences; veiled hints that revealed in half concealing. her husband's friend richards was there, too, near her. it was he who had been in the newspaper office when intelligence of the railroad disaster was received, with brently mallard's name leading the list of "killed." he had only taken the time to assure himself of its truth by a second telegram, and had hastened to forestall any less careful, less tender friend in bearing the sad message. she did not hear the story as many women have heard the same, with a paralyzed inability to accept its significance. which best describes the narrative voice? the author uses an omniscient narrator to reveal the thoughts and motivations of multiple characters in the story. the author uses an omniscient narrator to reveal the details of the railroad accident taking place far away. the author uses a character in the story as a narrator to establish the closeness between the sisters. the author uses a character in the story as a narrator to establish mrs. mallard’s grief at the news of her husband’s death.

What’s the question?

The author uses an omniscient narrator to reveal the thoughts and motivations of multiple characters in the story.

Explanation:

The above text was written with an omniscient narration which is the type of narration where the speaker knows all the details of the story, including the thoughts, goals and motivations of the characters, without being a character in the story.

We can see this, because the narration of the text shows a voice that knows what is happening at the moment, which is the exposure of someone's death. However, this narrator knows who died, where he died, how it was reported and he knows the fear of the characters to talk about it and give the sad news to each other.

In summary, the text features an omniscient narrator to reveal the thoughts and motivations of various characters in the story.

old english did not sound like modern english, which differs widely in phonology and especially in grammar, so taht old english is unintelligible to modern speakers.

the average english was strongly influenced by the anglo-norman as later by the anglo-french. the pronunciation was affected by the norman with the sounds   "/ θ / and / ð / " transcribed as th.

modern english was standarized from the london dialect and extended by the government and administartion as well as by the effects of printing, began to acquire more words from other languages as well to imporve in a more fluent pronunciation.