Will give ! both excerpts focus on the prince’s reaction to capulet and montage feud. how do the two excerpts compare? which one holds your interest more and why? what changes did shakespeare make in form, content, and style when he adapted brooke’s poem? in the space below, write a summary comparing and contrasting the two excerpts. include at least three specific references to the text.

This is what i wrote in the box, Its 149 words but im pretty sure you'll get a pass.

Explanation:

Both “The Tragically History of Romeus and Juliet.” And “Act 1, Scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet.” Compare by the prince having a deep response to the Capulet and Montague situation. The one that held my interest the most was “The Tragically History of Romeus and Juliet.” because it was mainly easier to understand. Shakespeare focused more on the way you can imagine a scene other than have a rhyme to it like in the poem. For example, the content and style of Shakespeare got more into detail about how big of a fight it was for example the text said “By thee, old Capulet, and Montague, Have thrice disturbed the quiet of our streets.” You can also see that Shakespeare was genuinely into expressing the outrage these people had the text also said “That quench the fire of your pernicious rage with purple fountains issuing from your veins.”

rudy is the nazi ideal, unfortunately for the nazis his ideal comes in the form of jesse the complete opposite of those who embrace the idea of white supremacy. over the course of the novel, rudy learns that he wants nothing to do with the hitler youth, and because of this his parents are forced to make a bargain; rudy's father is forced into the military, so that his son can remain home.   both liesel and hans influence that young man that rudy becomes. following han's example, rudy puts aside his own hunger to risk his life so that the jewish prisoners might have bread to eat.

can i see the painting?