How would the sentence stay the same if vulnerable were changed to open ?

The meaning will be subjected, but still equivalent.

Explanation:

Since there is no specific sentence, allow me to offer my own example:

Sylvia refused to become vulnerable.

See? Here, it is apparent that Sylvia does not want to show people her soft side. But, see how it differs in this sentence:

Sylvia refused to become open.

Now, there is a tonal change. When you are vulnerable, you are willing to admit that you are afraid, scared.

But open, in a more of a subversive manner, means the same thing. But open means you open up, or reveal yourself to people.

These sentences are similar, but they can be interpreted differently.

Hopefully this was helpful to you.

the author is intending to draw attention to the plight of refugees, editorial and biography support this. both workpieces make the reader empathize with enrique as well as with the other young migrants from central america. the writer, however, is using a different approach to each text.

the editorial includes strong words to persuade readers. he is trying hard to convince readers in the us to change its refugee approach.

the biography relies on narrative techniques and figurative language which the writer uses wisely in the setting, characterization, and personification to educate readers on the topic.

the correct answer is d.   to change the pace

explanation: