**will give brainliest if right** **150 or more words only**write an argument for or against the idea of using controlled fires to protect wild areas.

Wild forest fires cause in depth harm to flora and fauna and end in destruction of man-made property in and around the space of the fireside.

Controlled fires are used by agriculturists and forest officers to keep wild fires trapped. It involves careful, controlled burning of bound areas of the forest, to clear it off ignitable organic matter. within the event of fire, this cleared-off space acts as a barrier for fire from spreading more.

In the method of controlled burning, many wild animals are killed and lose their home ground. Thick smoke from such artificial fires may be a cause for environmental concern too.

Hope this helps, if you need more help however please feel free to comment on this post! Enjoy!

irving effectively uses emotional responses to create suspense in the story.irving’s tone creates expectations for the reader, which in turn create suspense.irving’s suspense would have been more effective with more vivid details.irving’s story is not suspenseful

this quote could be referring to the death penalty. it's questioning the morality of sentencing murderers to death as a punishment, because it seems hypocritical. this quote seems to be arguing for non-lethal punishment for killers.