Read this writing prompt right in argumentative essay about whether fast food companies should be allowed to advertise on children’s television stations based on the prom which claim is the strongest? a. because children need to be protected children’s television stations can be selective about the companies that advertise with them b. fast food companies should not be allowed to advertise on children’s television stations because fast food is harmful to children heath. c. many children enjoy fast food and they wanna stop eating even if it’s bad for their health and growth d. advertisers like to target children because they make millions of dollars every year from parents of child custody

B) Fast food companies should not be allowed to advertise on children’s television stations because fast food is harmful to children heath.

Explanation: an argument or claim is a statement assertion that something is true. In order to be effective, a claim should be clear, precise and have a strong argument, it also should have evidence that support it. From the given options, the strongest claim about whether fast food companies should be allowed to advertise on children's television stations, is the corresponding to option B, because it expresses its posture in a clear way ("Fast food companies should not be allowed to advertise on children’s television stations"), and it has a strong reason ("fast food is harmful to children health").

B

Explanation:

I took the test

that’s a nice boss :