Name one disadvantage for each of the three leadership styles. laissez-faire, authoritarian, democratic

The disadvantages of the three leadership styles are the following:

1. Laissez faire: the lack of control and supervision of this style can lead the team to do not achieve its goal efficiently. The project can face delays, re-process, and overload on some members of the team.

2. Authoritarian: the supervision can bring the team just to do what is needed to do and do not overcome or surpass the expectations of the projects. This also can make an stresful environment in which the team does not feel free and motivated to enhance and give more of what is required by the leader.

3. Democratic or participative: because this kind of leadership brings autonomy and initiative to the team, can happen that the leader do not guide efficiently the team to achieve a goal, so in this case this kind of leadership will requires a high-skilled leader. Or it also can happen that all the ideas of the team delays somehow the project and it is loosed lot of time to achieve an agreement on the path to follow.

subject: why anyone can be a genius.

occasion: moving forward in life.

audience: average person

purpose: to push you further in life

speaker: many famous geniuses.

here is the poem:

here is thy, and here is thee, genius is for what he can be.

poem is a matter of rhyme, but like ben frank said, life is a matter of time.

we have great inventors such as thomas edison, who said, "genius is one percent inspiration and 99% perspiration." no, no perspiration as what comes from your skeleton.

we have great minds, from places of all kinds, such as yu kaw la chi tie, (now im switching languages because yu kaw was japanese.)

てちハラスイヒイス, てちラスイヒイス

てちのちみスイヒイス.

you are a genius, well not yet, but you are capable, and that is a bet.

you have to tell us what you're talking about or it's impossible to answer.