me !   write two to four sentences comparing the excerpts from queen elizabeth's speeches. be sure to consider each speech’s purpose and use of rhetorical appeals. to the troops: let tyrants fear, i have always so behaved myself, that, under god, i have placed my chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and good will of my subjects, and therefore i am come amongst you, as you see, at this time, not for my recreation and disport, but being resolved in the midst and heat of the battle, to live or die among you all, to lay down for my god, and for my kingdoms, and for my people, my honour, and my blood, even in the dust. to parliament: for the other part, the manner of your petition i do well like, and take it in good part, because it is simple, and containeth no limitation of place or person: if it had been otherwise, i must needs have misliked it very much, and thought it in you a very great presumption, being unfitting and altogether unmeet for you to require them that may command

When comparing the two excerpts shown above, we can see that the first excerpt is focused on being an emotional speech, while the second excerpt is focused on being a rational speech.

We can arrive at this answer because:

With this, we can ensure that Elizabeth was a great speaker and knew how to express herself appropriately for each occasion.

More information:

link

These two speeches are very different in their purpose, their tone and their use of rhetorical appeals. In the first example, the Queen uses extremely emotional and inflammatory language. She wants to convince the troops of her support and her dedication, and she also wants to demonstrate that she understands their fears and she suffers them equally. On the other hand, the second example is significantly less emotional and a lot more rational and pragmatic.

hello!

your answer is a. ethical, emotional, and rational.

in order for someone to believe what you say it has to be ethical (morally correct). it should appeal to their emotions, and it must be rationally approving.

also, the other answer is incorrect.

hope this !

mark me brainliest!

have a great day!

~courtney

(you didn't attach a copy of the poem, but i'm answering as best as i can)

since a simile compares two unlike things using like or as, it kind of gives an item the ability to do something it can't.

example: "the player was like a tiger on the field"

in this sentence, the simile conveys the idea that the player was fast and strong, like a tiger.