Which two sentences in this excerpt from south! show that shackleton felt his men displayed determination in difficult situations? a(the conditions in the boat, uncomfortable before, had been made worse by the deluge of water.) all our gear was thoroughly wet again. our cooking-stove had been floating about in the bottom of the boat, and portions of our last hoosh seemed to have permeated everything. not until 3 a. m., when we were all chilled almost to the limit of endurance, did we manage to get the stove alight and make ourselves hot drinks. b(the carpenter was suffering particularly, but he showed grit and spirit.) vincent had for the past week ceased to be an active member of the crew, and i could not easily account for his collapse. physically he was one of the strongest men in the boat. he was a young man, he had served on north sea trawlers, and he should have been able to bear hardships better than mccarthy, who, not so strong, was always happy … c( gentle snow-slope descended at our feet towards a valley that separated our ridge from the hills immediately behind husvik, and as we stood gazing worsley said solemnly, “boss, it looks too good to be true! ”) down we went, to be checked presently by the sight of water 2500 ft. below. we could see the little wave-ripples on the black beach, penguins strutting to and fro, and dark objects that looked like seals lolling lazily on the sand. this was an eastern arm of fortuna bay, separated by the ridge from the arm we had seen below us during the night. the slope we were traversing appeared to end in a precipice above this beach. d(but our revived spirits were not to be damped by difficulties on the last stage of the journey, and we camped cheerfully for breakfast.) whilst worsley and crean were digging a hole for the lamp and starting the cooker i climbed a ridge above us, cutting steps with the adze, in order to secure an extended view of the country below.

    The two sentences included in the excerpt that demonstrates that Shackleton felt his men displayed determination in difficult situations are the following observations :

  "When we were all chilled almost to the limit of endurance, did we manage to get the stove alight and make ourselves hot drinks (The carpenter was suffering particularly, but he showed grit and spirit)"

  "The slope we were traversing appeared to end in a precipice above this beach. (But our revived spirits were not to be damped by difficulties on the last stage of the journey, and we camped cheerfully for breakfast)"

  Then, B and D are the answers to our question.

you need to explain that more, your grammer just needs to be close to perfect.

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this