English, 30.06.2019 09:30 rileyeddins1010
The tinker vs des moines supreme court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school to protest the vietnam war. the school district suspended the students, possibly violating their right to free speech. which best summarizes the majority opinion? a. there is no precedent for schools to limit the rights of students, so it is unconstitutional to suspend the students for their armbands. b. the case went through process of judicial review to determine that fear of disruption alone was reason enough to suspend the students. c. the first amendment protects the students' rights to wear the armbands ; they weren't disruptive, and the school allowed other students to wear controversial symbols. d. the second amendment guarantees citizens the right to bear arms and form a militia, so they were allowed to express their feelings about the war. i think the answer is c, but what do you guys think?
Answers: 1
English, 21.06.2019 14:30
What do you think about world hunger? what could we do to make it better or fix it to where people are getting the things they need? what would you do?
Answers: 2
English, 22.06.2019 04:00
In the excerpt above, what can be inferred by the statement, "the dillingham had been flung to the breeze during aformer period of prosperity.?
Answers: 1
English, 22.06.2019 06:00
Describe the misfitโs experience of the world. to what extent can his criminality be attributed to the conditions of his life? even though he is not in jail, is he a free man?
Answers: 1
English, 22.06.2019 10:10
:be at 's on 29.at 7: 30 p.m. ofgo toofin .is ,toor , as.be. is to at 9: 30 p.m. is? a. of b. c.d. of
Answers: 2
The tinker vs des moines supreme court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school...
Computers and Technology, 23.10.2019 19:00
Arts, 23.10.2019 19:00
Health, 23.10.2019 19:00
History, 23.10.2019 19:00
Computers and Technology, 23.10.2019 19:00
History, 23.10.2019 19:00
Advanced Placement (AP), 23.10.2019 19:00
Health, 23.10.2019 19:00