subject
English, 30.06.2019 09:30 rileyeddins1010

The tinker vs des moines supreme court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school to protest the vietnam war. the school district suspended the students, possibly violating their right to free speech. which best summarizes the majority opinion? a. there is no precedent for schools to limit the rights of students, so it is unconstitutional to suspend the students for their armbands. b. the case went through process of judicial review to determine that fear of disruption alone was reason enough to suspend the students. c. the first amendment protects the students' rights to wear the armbands ; they weren't disruptive, and the school allowed other students to wear controversial symbols. d. the second amendment guarantees citizens the right to bear arms and form a militia, so they were allowed to express their feelings about the war. i think the answer is c, but what do you guys think?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 14:30
What do you think about world hunger? what could we do to make it better or fix it to where people are getting the things they need? what would you do?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:00
In the excerpt above, what can be inferred by the statement, "the dillingham had been flung to the breeze during aformer period of prosperity.?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:00
Describe the misfitโ€™s experience of the world. to what extent can his criminality be attributed to the conditions of his life? even though he is not in jail, is he a free man?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 10:10
:be at 's on 29.at 7: 30 p.m. ofgo toofin .is ,toor , as.be. is to at 9: 30 p.m. is? a. of b. c.d. of
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The tinker vs des moines supreme court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722361