Read this claim and evidence from the passage. claim: antibiotics can lead to the formation of superbugs. evidence: it was difficult for eli's parent to administer antibiotics to him. which statement best evaluates the relevancy and sufficiency of the evidence to this claim? the evidence is both relevant and sufficient. the evidence is relevant but not sufficient. the evidence is sufficient but not relevant. the evidence is neither relevant nor sufficient. need quick i cant figure this out and its due in 20 minutes

I think that the correct answer is "the evidence in neither relevant nor sufficient".

The answer is: The evidence is neither relevant nor sufficient.

In this example the evidence provided “It was difficult for Eli's parent to administer antibiotics to him.” Is not relevant due to does not support any part of the claim “Antibiotics can lead to the formation of superbugs.” And as the evidence does not support the claim neither is sufficient.

active voice: my father cut the tree.

passive voice: the tree was cut by my father.

active voice: people buy newspapers every day.

passive voice: newspapers are bought (by people) every day.

active voice: people have been using movies as political propaganda since world war ii.

passive voice: movies have been used as political propaganda since world war ii.

active voice: donna gave me my birthday present.

passive voice: i was given my birthday present (by donna). / my birthday present was given to me (by donna).

active voice: mom will leave the keys on the counter.

passive voice: the keys will be left (by mom) on the counter.

the words in parentheses are the agent of the passive voice and can be omitted when obvious, generic, or simply unnecessary.

do you have any answer choices ? ?

explanation: