How does this quotation from " a native american view” affect the author’s argument? the author is arguing that the american indians were able to the pilgrims, because they were sophisticated. the author is arguing that the american indians were nice, and that is why they the pilgrims. the author is arguing that the pilgrims were not friendly, in contrast to the american indians. the author is arguing that neither the pilgrims nor the american indians were friendly.

The author is arguing that the American Indians were able to help the Pilgrims , because they were sophisticated. In the sense that Pilgrims knew how to hunt, but they weren't as effective as American Indians because Native American had certain degree of sophistication in catching these particular preys. The same happened in fishing. Pilgrims knew how to fish, but they weren't so effective in fishing because they didn't have the sophistication that native American had.

its A) The author is arguing that the American Indians were able to help the Pilgrims , because they were sophisticated.

Explanation:

the legal limit for the drivers who can drive after consuming any amount of alcohol is 21 years.

explanation:

on november 1, 1996, a "zero tolerance law" was put into effect in the new york state.

according to this zero tolerance law, for people under the age of 21 years, it was illegal to purchase and possess alcohol or to drive after consuming any amount of it.

also, the alcohol involvement rate for the drivers under the age of 21 was roughly twice that of elderly drivers.

choice 2 i like that prompt better.