How does wiesel reestablish his ethos in the conclusion to "the perils of indifference"? a. he provides an emotional image of a young boy accompanying an old man. b. he gives factual information about his life and experiences during the war. c. he reminds the audience of his experiences as a holocaust survivor. d. he asks the audience to remember the holocaust always.

Hello there!

Wiesel seems to reestablished his ethos by reminding the audience of his experience as a Holocaust survivor. Correct answer is c: He reminds the audience of his experiences as a Holocaust survivor.

Hope this helps!

If yes, please, mark brainliest :)

Have a good day.

The correct answer is:

C. He reminds the audience of his experiences as a Holocaust survivor.

Explanation:

The Perils of Indifference is a speech given by Elie Wiesel where he talked about how being indifferent to the suffering and cruelty of other people only brings more sorrow, and threatens the humanity in the world.

Wiesel appealed to Ethos which is a method used to convince the audience of the credibility and authority on a subject to prove the statement he made about indifference, by reminding the audience of his experiences as a Holocaust survivor, Wiesel talked about how leaders from all over the world were indifferent to the suffering from Jewish people in Auschwitz and Treblinka and how that indifference only made them feel abandoned and forgotten, a fact that only brought them even more suffering.

i believe that the answer is b! i hope i out!

what are the following?