For what purpose do the authors use the bagel example within their argument? to extend the argument beyond sumo to a broader group of people. to focus on one person, paul feldman, instead of a group of people, sumo wrestlers to entertain the reader with anecdotes about “the guy who brings in the bagels” to argue how people’s careers take unexpected turns

Explanation:

The authors endeavor to portray professional wrongdoing which is another name for tricking in business condition. Consequently, they give a case of Enron outrage, nearly the greatest money related misrepresentation conspire ever.

The authors guarantee that individuals who speak to the scholarly division don't think enough about the reality of the issue when the con artists lead calm and upbeat lives.

faulty parallelism is a grammar construction where there is no balance in the parts of a sentence they have a similar meaning but the grammar structure is not equivalent.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

jefferson wrote the declaration of independence, and he was the nation's third president.

the problem with the first version is that the sentence:

"jefferson was both the writer of the declaration of independence"

presents jefferson as both a subject and an agent for the verb "write" because if he was "the writer" then the declaration of independence was written by him, besides that fact, the sentence presents a dependent clause.

while the second sentence:

he was the nation's third president.

presents a basic subject+verb+object structure

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in both sentences:

jefferson wrote the declaration of independence, and he was the nation third president.