subject
English, 23.09.2019 03:30 valvaldeziv6373

Read this excerpt from “schenck v. u. s., 249 u. s. 47 (1919)" and answer the question that follows:
this is an indictment in three counts. the first charges a conspiracy to violate the espionage act of june 15, 1917, by causing and attempting to cause insubordination, in the military and naval forces of the united states, and to obstruct the recruiting and enlistment service of the united states, when the united states was at war with the german empire, to-wit, that the defendant willfully conspired to have printed and circulated to men who had been called and accepted for military service under the act of may 18, 1917, a document set forth and alleged to be calculated to cause such insubordination and obstruction. the count alleges overt acts in pursuance of the conspiracy, ending in the distribution of the document set forth. the second count alleges a conspiracy to commit an offense against the united states, to-wit, to use the mails for the transmission of matter declared to be non-mailable by title 12, 2, of the act of june 15, 1917, to-wit, the above mentioned document, with an averment of the same overt acts. the third count charges an unlawful use of the mails for the transmission of the same matter and otherwise as above. the defendants were found guilty on all the counts. they set up the first amendment to the constitution forbidding congress to make any law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, and bringing the case here on that ground have argued some other points also of which we must dispose.
according to the bolded lines, what is one reason for schenck’s indictment?
he tried to send something through the mail illegally.
he supported the act of jun 15, 1917.
he tried to join the united states navy.
he others join the military.
question 19(multiple choice worth 5 points)
[lc]
read this excerpt from “schenck v. u. s., 249 u. s. 47 (1919)" and answer the question that follows:
this is an indictment in three counts. the first charges a conspiracy to violate the espionage act of june 15, 1917, by causing and attempting to cause insubordination, in the military and naval forces of the united states, and to obstruct the recruiting and enlistment service of the united states, when the united states was at war with the german empire, to-wit, that the defendant willfully conspired to have printed and circulated to men who had been called and accepted for military service under the act of may 18, 1917, a document set forth and alleged to be calculated to cause such insubordination and obstruction. the count alleges overt acts in pursuance of the conspiracy, ending in the distribution of the document set forth. the second count alleges a conspiracy to commit an offense against the united states, to-wit, to use the mails for the transmission of matter declared to be non-mailable by title 12, 2, of the act of june 15, 1917, to-wit, the above mentioned document, with an averment of the same overt acts. the third count charges an unlawful use of the mails for the transmission of the same matter and otherwise as above. the defendants were found guilty on all the counts. they set up the first amendment to the constitution forbidding congress to make any law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, and bringing the case here on that ground have argued some other points also of which we must dispose.
according to the bolded lines, what is one reason for schenck’s indictment?
he organize a mail campaign for the military.
he tried to send something through the mail illegally.
he tried to encourage men to sign up for enlistment.
he tried to join the united states navy.
question 20(multiple choice worth 5 points)
[mc]
lauren has found the following information during the research process for her informative paper:
a map of lightning strikes in three neighboring states over the last 5 years
a scientific description of the conditions in which lightning develops
an eye-witness account of a lightning strike
a detailed account of a day in the life of a storm chaser
what is the most useful next step in the writing process for lauren?
conduct her own study of nearby lightning strikes.
develop an organizational plan for these details.
determine how these sources relate to one another.
write an introduction and conclusion for her paper.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 18:00
Which is the best strategy for responding to counter-arguments in your persuasive research essay? a. avoid addressing opinions that point out flaws in your thesis. b. use language that will appeal to the emotions of your audience. c. respond to reasonable outlooks instead of weak ones. d. ignore any evidence that does not support your own thesis
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 22:00
Select the correct answer. read this excerpt from leo tolstoy's the death of ivan ilyich: her attitude towards him and his diseases is still the same. just as the doctor had adopted a certain relation to his patient which he could not abandon, so had she formed one towards him—that he was not doing something he ought to do and was himself to blame, and that she reproached him lovingly for this—and she could not now change that attitude. "you see he doesn't listen to me and doesn't take his medicine at the proper time. and above all he lies in a position that is no doubt bad for him—with his legs up." she described how he made gerasim hold his legs up. the doctor smiled with a contemptuous affability that said: "what's to be done? these sick people do have foolish fancies of that kind, but we must forgive them. . " they all rose, said good-night, and went away. when they had gone it seemed to ivan ilyich that he felt better; the falsity had gone with them. but the pain remained—that same pain and that same fear that made everything monotonously alike, nothing harder and nothing easier. everything was worse. again minute followed minute and hour followed hour. everything remained the same and there was no cessation. and the inevitable end of it all became more and more terrible. based on the excerpt, how is praskovya fedorovna a character foil to ivan ilyich? a. she is kind and takes care of ivan, which is why he feels guilty about how he treated her for most of their married life. b. she is vindictive toward ivan while pretending to be worried about him, thus reminding him of how his family has never forgiven him. c. she plays the part of the worried wife without any real feeling, symbolizing the false propriety ivan upheld but now hates. d. she is young, healthy, and beautiful—everything ivan can never be again and wishes he could return to. reset next
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:00
Urban and rural antonyms synonyms neither
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 05:30
What does the narrator do in this passage to increase suspense and encourage the reader to continue reading
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Read this excerpt from “schenck v. u. s., 249 u. s. 47 (1919)" and answer the question that follows:...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722362